2021/03/09
By Kyle Wesson, Daniel Shepard, and Todd Humphreys
Disruption created by intentional generation of fake GPS signals could have serious economic consequences. This article discusses how typical civil GPS receivers respond to an advanced civil GPS spoofing attack, and four techniques to counter such attacks: spread-spectrum security codes, navigation message authentication, dual-receiver correlation of military signals, and vestigial signal defense. Unfortunately, any kind of anti-spoofing, however necessary, is a tough sell.
GPS spoofing has become a hot topic. At the 2011 Institute of Navigation (ION) GNSS conference, 18 papers discussed spoofing, compared with the same number over the past decade. ION-GNSS also featured its first panel session on anti-spoofing, called “Improving Security of GNSS Receivers,” which offered six security experts a forum to debate the most promising anti-spoofing technologies.
The spoofing threat has also drawn renewed U.S. government scrutiny since the initial findings of the 2001 Volpe Report. In November 2010, the U.S. Position Navigation and Timing National Executive Committee requested that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) conduct a comprehensive risk assessment on the use of civil GPS. In February 2011, the DHS Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center began its investigation in conjunction with subject-matter experts in academia, finance, power, and telecommunications, among others. Their findings will be summarized in two forthcoming reports, one on the spoofing and jamming threat and the other on possible mitigation techniques. The reports are anticipated to show that GPS disruption due to spoofing or jamming could have serious economic consequences.
Effective techniques exist to defend receivers against spoofing attacks. This article summarizes state-of-the-art anti-spoofing techniques and suggests a path forward to equip civil GPS receivers with these defenses. We start with an analysis of a typical civil GPS receiver’s response to our laboratory’s powerful spoofing device. This will illustrate the range of freedom a spoofer has when commandeering a victim receiver’s tracking loops. We will then provide an overview of promising cryptographic and non-cryptographic anti-spoofing techniques and highlight the obstacles that impede their widespread adoption.
The Spoofing Threat
Spoofing is the transmission of matched-GPS-signal-structure interference in an attempt to commandeer the tracking loops of a victim receiver and thereby manipulate the receiver’s timing or navigation solution. A spoofer can transmit its counterfeit signals from a stand-off distance of several hundred meters or it can be co-located with its victim.
Spoofing attacks can be classified as simple, intermediate, or sophisticated in terms of their effectiveness and subtlety. In 2003, the Vulnerability Assessment Team at Argonne National Laboratory carried off a successful simple attack in which they programmed a GPS signal simulator to broadcast high-powered counterfeit GPS signals toward a victim receiver. Although such a simple attack is easy to mount, the equipment is expensive, and the attack is readily detected because the counterfeit signals are not synchronized to their authentic counterparts.
In an intermediate spoofing attack, a spoofer synchronizes its counterfeit signals with the authentic GPS signals so they are code-phase-aligned at the target receiver. This method requires a spoofer to determine the position and velocity of the victim receiver, but it affords the spoofer a serious advantage: the attack is difficult to detect and mitigate.
The sophisticated attack involves a network of coordinated intermediate-type spoofers that replicate not only the content and mutual alignment of visible GPS signals but also their spatial distribution, thus fooling even multi-antenna spoofing defenses.
Table 1. Comparison of anti-spoofing techniques discussed in this article.
Lab Attack. So far, no open literature has reported development or research into the sophisticated attack. This is likely because of the success of the intermediate-type attack: to date, no civil GPS receiver tested in our laboratory has fended off an intermediate-type spoofing attack. The spoofing attacks, which are always conducted via coaxial cable or in radio-frequency test enclosures, are performed with our laboratory’s receiver-spoofer, an advanced version of the one introduced at the 2008 ION-GNSS conference (see “Assessing the Spoofing Threat,” GPS World, January 2009).
To commence the attack, the spoofer transmits its counterfeit signals in code-phase alignment with the authentic signals but at power level below the noise floor. The spoofer then increases the power of the spoofed signals so that they are slightly greater than the power of the authentic signals. At this point, the spoofer has taken control of the victim receiver’s tracking loops and can slowly lead the spoofed signals away from the authentic signals, carrying the receiver’s tracking loops with it. Once the spoofed signals have moved more than 600 meters in position or 2 microseconds in time away from the authentic signals, the receiver can be considered completely owned by the spoofer.
Spoofing testbed at the University of Texas Radionavigation Laboratory, an advanced and powerful suite for anti-spoofing research. On the right are several of the civil GPS receivers tested and the radio-frequency test enclosure, and on the left are the phasor measurement unit and the civil GPS spoofer.
Although our spoofer fooled all of the receivers tested in our laboratory, there are significant differences between receivers’ dynamic responses to spoofing attacks. It is important to understand the types of dynamics that a spoofer can induce in a target receiver to gain insight into the actual dangers that a spoofing attack poses rather than rely on unrealistic assumptions or models of a spoofing attack. For example, a recent paper on time-stamp manipulation of the U.S. power grid assumed that there was no limit to the rate of change that a spoofer could impose on a victim receiver’s position and timing solution, which led to unrealistic conclusions.
Experiments performed in our laboratory sought to answer three specific questions regarding spoofer-induced dynamics:
How quickly can a timing or position bias be introduced?
What kinds of oscillations can a spoofer cause in a receiver’s position and timing?
How different are receiver responses to spoofing?
These questions were answered by determining the maximum spoofer-induced pseudorange acceleration that can be used to reach a certain final velocity when starting from a velocity of zero, without raising any alarms or causing the target receiver to lose satellite lock. The curve in the velocity-acceleration plane created by connecting these points defines the upper bound of a region within which the spoofer can safely manipulate the target receiver. These data points can be obtained empirically and fit to an exponential curve. Alarms on the receiver may cause some deviations from this curve depending on the particular receiver.
Figure 1 shows an example of the velocity-acceleration curve for a high-quality handheld receiver, whose position and timing solution can be manipulated quite aggressively during a spoofing attack. These results suggest that the receiver’s robustness — its ability to provide navigation and timing solutions despite extreme signal dynamics — is actually a liability in regard to spoofing. The receiver’s ability to track high accelerations and velocities allows a spoofer to aggressively manipulate its navigation solution.
Figure 1. Theoretical and experimental test results for a high-quality handheld receiver’s dynamic response to a spoofing attack. Although not shown here, the maximum attainable velocity is around 1,300 meters/second.
The relative ease with which a spoofer can manipulate some GPS receivers suggests that GPS-dependent infrastructure is vulnerable. For example, the telecommunications network and the power grid both rely on GPS time-reference receivers for accurate timing. Our laboratory has performed tests on such receivers to determine the disruptions that a successful spoofing attack could cause. The remainder of this section highlights threats to these two sectors of critical national infrastructure.
Cell-Phone Vulnerability. Code division multiple access (CDMA) cell-phone towers rely on GPS timing for tower-to-tower synchronization. Synchronization prevents towers from interfering with one another and enables call hand-off between towers. If a particular tower’s time estimate deviates more than 10 microseconds from GPS time, hand-off to and from that tower is disrupted. Our tests indicate that a spoofer could induce a 10-microsecond time deviation within about 30 minutes for a typical CDMA tower setup. A spoofer, or spoofer network, could also cause multiple neighboring towers to interfere with one another. This is possible because CDMA cell-phone towers all use the same spreading code and distinguish themselves only by the phasing (that is, time offset) of their spreading codes. Furthermore, it appears that a spoofer could impair CDMA-based E911 user-location.
Power-Grid Vulnerability. Like the cellular network, the power grid of the future will rely on accurate GPS time-stamps. The efficiency of power distribution across the grid can be improved with real-time measurements of the voltage and current phasors. Phasor measurement units (PMUs) have been proposed as a smart-grid technology for precisely this purpose. PMUs rely on GPS to time-stamp their measurements, which are sent back to a central monitoring station for processing. Currently, PMUs are used for closed-loop grid control in only a few applications, but power-grid modernization efforts will likely rely more heavily on PMUs for control. If a spoofer manipulates a PMU’s time stamps, it could cause spurious variations in measured phase angles. These variations could distort power flow or stability estimates in such a way that grid operators would take incorrect or unnecessary control actions including powering up or shutting down generators, potentially causing blackouts or damage to power-grid equipment.
Under normal circumstances, a changing separation in the phase angle between two PMUs indicates changes in power flow between the regions measured by each PMU. Tests demonstrate that a spoofer could cause variations in a PMU’s measured voltage phase angle at a rate of 1.73 degrees per minute. Thus, a spoofing attack could create the false indications of power flow across the grid. The tests results also reveal, however, that it is impossible for a spoofer to cause changes in small-signal grid stability estimates, which would require the spoofer to induce rapid (for example, 0.1–3 Hz) microsecond-amplitude oscillations in timing. Such oscillations correspond to spoofing dynamics well outside the region of freedom of all receivers we have tested. A spoofer might also be able to affect fault-location estimates obtained through time-difference-of-arrival techniques using PMU measurements. This could cause large errors in fault-location estimates and hamper repair efforts.
What Can Be Done? Despite the success of the intermediate-type spoofing attack against a wide variety of civil GPS receivers and the known vulnerabilities of GPS-dependent critical infrastructure to spoofing attacks, anti-spoofing techniques exist that would enable receivers to successfully defend themselves against such attacks. We now turn to four promising anti-spoofing techniques.
Cryptographic Methods
These techniques enable a receiver to differentiate authentic GPS signals from counterfeit signals with high likelihood. Cryptographic strategies rely on the unpredictability of so-called security codes that modulate the GPS signal. An unpredictable code forces a spoofer who wishes to mount a successful spoofing attack to either
estimate the unpredictable chips on-the-fly, or
record and play back authentic GPS spectrum (a meaconing attack).
To avoid unrealistic expectations, it should be noted that no anti-spoofing technique is completely impervious to spoofing. GPS signal authentication is inherently probabilistic, even when rooted in cryptography. Many separate detectors and cross-checks, each with its own probability of false alarm, are involved in cryptographic spoofing detection. Figure 2 illustrates how the jammer-to-noise ratio detector, timing consistency check, security-code estimation and replay attack (SCER) detector, and cryptographic verification block all work together. This hybrid combination of statistical hypothesis tests and Boolean logic demonstrates the complexities and subtleties behind a comprehensive, probabilistic GPS signal authentication strategy for security-enhanced signals.
Figure 2. GNSS receiver components required for GNSS signal authentication. Components that support code origin authentication are outlined in bold and have a gray fill, whereas components that support code timing authentication are outlined in bold and have no fill. The schematic assumes a security code based on navigation message authentication.
Spread Spectrum Security Codes. In 2003, Logan Scott proposed a cryptographic anti-spoofing technique based on spread spectrum security codes (SSSCs). The most recent proposed version of this technique targets the L1C signal, which will be broadcast on GPS Block III satellites, because the L1C waveform is not yet finalized. Unpredictable SSSCs could be interleaved with the L1C spreading code on the L1C data channel, as illustrated in Figure 3. Since L1C acquisition and tracking occurs on the pilot channel, the presence of the SSSCs has negligible impact on receivers. Once tracking L1C, a receiver can predict when the next SSSC will be broadcast but not its exact sequence. Upon reception of an SSSC, the receiver stores the front-end samples corresponding to the SSSC interval in memory. Sometime later, the cryptographic digital key that generated the SSSC is transmitted over the navigation message. With knowledge of the digital key, the receiver generates a copy of the actual transmitted SSSC and correlates it with the previously-recorded digital samples. Spoofing is declared if the correlation power falls below a pre-determined threshold.
Figure 3. Placement of the periodically unpredictable spread spectrum security codes in the GPS L1C data channel spreading sequence.
When the security-code chip interval is short (high chipping rate), it is difficult for a spoofer to estimate and replay the security code in real time. Thus, the SSSC technique on L1C offers a strong spoofing defense since the L1C chipping rate is high (that is, 1.023 MChips/second). Furthermore, the SSSC technique does not rely on the receiver obtaining additional information from a side channel; all the relevant codes and keys are broadcast over the secured GPS signals. Of course a disadvantage for SSSC is that it requires a fairly fundamental change to the currently-proposed L1C definition: the L1C spreading codes must be altered.
Implementation of the SSSC technique faces long odds, partly because it is late in the L1C planning schedule to introduce a change to the spreading codes. Nonetheless, in September 2011, Logan Scott and Phillip Ward advocated for SSSC at the Public Interface Control Working Group meeting, passing the first of many wickets. The proposal and associated Request for Change document will now proceed to the Lower Level GPS Engineering Requirements Branch for further technical review. If approved there, it passes to the Joint Change Review Board for additional review and, if again approved, to the Technical Interchange Meeting for further consideration. The chances that the SSSC proposal will survive this gauntlet would be much improved if some government agency made a formal request to the GPS Directorate to include SSSCs in L1C — and provided the funding to do so. The DHS seems to us a logical sponsoring agency.
Navigation Message Authentication. If an L1C SSSC implementation proves unworkable, an alternative, less-invasive cryptographic authentication scheme based on navigation message authentication (NMA) represents a strong fall-back option. In the same 2003 ION-GNSS paper that he proposed SSSC, Logan Scott also proposed NMA. His paper was preceded by an internal study at MITRE and followed by other publications in the open literature, all of which found merit in the NMA approach. The NMA technique embeds public-key digital signatures into the flexible GPS civil navigation (CNAV) message, which offers a convenient conveyance for such signatures. The CNAV format was designed to be extensible so that new messages can be defined within the framework of the GPS Interference Specification (IS). The current GPS IS defines only 15 of 64 CNAV messages, reserving the undefined 49 CNAV messages for future use.
Our lab recently demonstrated that NMA works to authenticate not only the navigation message but also the underlying signal. In other words, NMA can be the basis of comprehensive signal authentication. We have proposed a specific implementation of NMA that is packaged for immediate adoption. Our proposal defines two new CNAV messages that deliver a standardized public-key elliptic-curve digital algorithm (ECDSA) signature via the message format in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Format of the proposed CNAV ECDSA signature message, which delivers the first or second half of the 466-bit ECDSA signature and a 5-bit salt in the 238-bit payload field.
Although the CNAV message format is flexible, it is not without constraints. The shortest block of data in which a complete signature can be embedded is a 96-second signature block such as the one shown in Figure 5. In this structure, the two CNAV signature messages are interleaved between the ephemeris and clock data to meet the broadcast requirements.
Figure 5. The shortest broadcast signature block that does not violate the CNAV ephemeris and timing broadcast requirements. To meet the required broadcast interval of 48 seconds for message types 10, 11, and one of 30–39, the ECDSA signature is broadcast over a 96-second signature block that is composed of eight CNAV messages.
The choice of the duration between signature blocks is a tradeoff between offering frequent authentication and maintaining a low percentage of the CNAV message reserved for the digital signature. In our proposal, signature blocks are transmitted roughly every five minutes (Figure 6) so that only 7.5 percent of the navigation message is devoted to the digital signature. Across the GPS constellation, the signature block could be offset so that a receiver could authenticate at least one channel approximately every 30 seconds. Like SSSC, our proposed version of NMA does not require a receiver’s getting additional information from a side channel, provided the receiver obtains public key updates on a yearly basis.
Figure 6. A signed 336-second broadcast. The proposed strategy signs every 28 CNAV messages with a signature broadcast over two CNAV messages on each broadcast channel.
NMA is inherently less secure than SSSC. A NMA security code chip interval (that is, 20 milliseconds) is longer than a SSSC chip interval, thereby allowing the spoofer more time to estimate the digital signature on-the-fly. That is not to say, however, that NMA is ineffective. In fact, tests with our laboratory’s spoofing testbed demonstrated the NMA-based signal authentication structure described earlier offered a receiver a better-than 95 percent probability of detecting a spoofing attack for a 0.01 percent probability of false alarm under a challenging spoofing-attack scenario.
NMA is best viewed as a hedge. If the SSSC approach does not gain traction, then NMA might, since it only requires defining two new CNAV messages in the GPS IS — a relatively minor modification. CNAV-based NMA could defend receivers tracking L2C and L5. A new CNAV2 message will eventually be broadcast on L1 via L1C, so a repackaged CNAV2-based NMA technique could offer even single-frequency L1 receivers a signal-side anti-spoofing defense.
P(Y) Code Dual-Receiver Correlation. This approach avoids entirely the issue of GPS IS modifications. The technique correlates the unknown encrypted military P(Y) code between two civil GPS receivers, exploiting known carrier-phase and code-phase relationships. It is similar to the dual-frequency codeless and semi-codeless techniques that civil GPS receivers apply to track the P(Y) code on L2. Peter Levin and others filed a patent on the codeless-based signal authentication technique in 2008; Mark Psiaki extended the approach to semicodeless correlation and narrow-band receivers in a 2011 ION-GNSS paper.
In the dual-receiver technique, one receiver, stationed in a secure location, tracks the authentic L1 C/A codes while receiving the encrypted P(Y) code. The secure receiver exploits the known timing and phase relationships between the C/A code and P(Y) code to isolate the P(Y) code, of which it sends raw samples (codeless technique) or estimates of the encrypting W-code chips (semi-codeless technique) over a secure network to the defending receiver. The defending receiver correlates its locally-extracted P(Y) with the samples or W-code estimates from the secure receiver. If a spoofing attack is underway, the correlation power will drop below a statistical threshold, thereby causing the defending receiver to declare a spoofing attack. Although the P(Y) code is 20 MHz wide, a narrowband civil GPS receiver with 2.6 MHz bandwidth can still perform the statistical hypothesis tests even with the resulting 5.5 dB attenuation of the P(Y) code. Because the dual-receiver method can run continuously in the background as part of a receiver’s standard GPS signal processing, it can declare a spoofing attack within seconds — a valuable feature for many applications.
Two considerations about the dual-receiver technique are worth noting. First, the secure receiver must be protected from spoofing for the technique to succeed. Second, the technique requires a secure communication link between the two receivers. Although the first requirement is easily achieved by locating secure receivers in secure locations, the second requirement makes the technique impractical for some applications that cannot support a continuous communication link.
Of all the proposed cryptographic anti-spoofing techniques, only the dual-receiver method could be implemented today. Unfortunately the P(Y) code will no longer exist after 2021, meaning that systems that make use of the P(Y)-based dual-receiver technique will be rendered unprotected, although a similar M-code-based technique could be an effective replacement. The dual-receiver method, therefore, is best thought of as a stop-gap: it can provide civil GPS receivers with an effective anti-spoofing technique today until a signal-side civil GPS authentication technique is approved and implemented in the future This sentiment was the consensus of the panel experts at the 2011 ION-GNSS session on civil GPS receiver security.
Non-Cryptographic Methods
Non-cryptographic techniques are enticing because they can be made receiver-autonomous, requiring neither security-enhanced civil GPS signals nor a side-channel communication link. The literature contains a number of proposed non-cryptographic anti-spoofing techniques. Frequently, however, these techniques rely on additional hardware, such as accelerometers or inertial measurements units, which may exceed the cost, size, or weight requirements in many applications. This motivates research to develop software-based, receiver-autonomous anti-spoofing methods.
Vestigial Signal Defense (VSD). This software-based, receiver-autonomous anti-spoofing technique relies on the difficulty of suppressing the true GPS signal during a spoofing attack. Unless the spoofer generates a phase-aligned nulling signal at the phase center of the victim GPS receiver’s antenna, a vestige of the authentic signal remains and manifests as a distortion of the complex correlation function. VSD monitors distortion in the complex correlation domain to determine if a spoofing attack is underway.
To be an effective defense, the VSD must overcome a significant challenge: it must distinguish between spoofing and multipath. The interaction of the authentic and spoofed GPS signals is similar to the interaction of direct-path and multipath GPS signals. Our most recent work on the VSD suggests that differentiating spoofing from multipath is enough of a challenge that the goal of the VSD should only be to reduce the degrees-of-freedom available to a spoofer, forcing the spoofer to act in a way that makes the spoofing signal or vestige of the authentic GPS signal mimic multipath. In other words, the VSD seeks to corner the spoofer and reduce its space of possible dynamics.
Among other options, two potential effective VSD techniques are
a maximum-likelihood bistatic-radar-based approach and
a phase-pseudorange consistency check.
The first approach examines the spatial and temporal consistency of the received signals to detect inconsistencies between the instantaneous received multipath and the typical multipath background environment. The second approach, which is similar to receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) techniques, monitors phase and pseudorange observables to detect inconsistencies potentially caused by spoofing. Again, a spoofer can act like multipath to avoid detection, but this means that the VSD would have achieved its modest goal.
Anti-Spoofing Reality Check
Security is a tough sell. Although promising anti-spoofing techniques exist, the reality is that no anti-spoofing techniques currently defend civil GPS receivers. All anti-spoofing techniques face hurdles. A primary challenge for any technique that proposes modifying current or proposed GPS signals is the tremendous inertia behind GPS signal definitions. Given the several review boards whose approval an SSSC or NMA approach would have to gain, the most feasible near-term cryptographic anti-spoofing technique is the dual-receiver method. A receiver-autonomous, non-cryptographic approach, such as the VSD, also warrants further development. But ultimately, the SSSC or NMA techniques should be implemented: a signal-side civil GPS cryptographic anti-spoofing technique would be of great benefit in protecting civil GPS receivers from spoofing attacks.
Manufacturers
The high-quality handheld receiver cited in Figure 1 was a Trimble Juno SB. Testbed equipment shown: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories SEL-421 synchrophasor measurement unit; Ramsey STE 3000 radio-frequency test chamber; Ettus Research USRP N200 universal software radio peripheral; Schweitzer SEL-2401 satellite-synchronized clock (blue); Trimble Resolution SMT receiver (silver); HP GPS time and frequency reference receiver.
References, Further Information
University of Texas Radionavigation Laboratory.
Full results of Figure 1 experiment are given in Shepard, D.P. and T.E. Humphreys, “Characterization of Receiver Response to Spoofing Attacks,” Proceedings of ION-GNSS 2011.
NMA can be the basis of comprehensive signal authentication: Wesson, K.D., M. Rothlisberger, T. E. Humphreys (2011), “Practical cryptographic civil GPS signal authentication,” Navigation, Journal of the ION, submitted for review.
Humphreys, T.E, “Detection Strategy for Cryptographic GNSS Anti-Spoofing,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2011, submitted for review.
Kyle Wesson is pursuing his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. He is a member of the Radionavigation Laboratory. He received his B.S. from Cornell University.
Daniel Shepard is pursuing his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in aerospace engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, where he also received his B.S. He is a member of the Radionavigation Laboratory.
Todd Humphreys is an assistant professor in the department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University of Texas at Austin and director of the Radionavigation Laboratory. He received a Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from Cornell University.
item: Jammer! - jammer!
4.4
17 votes
jammer!
That is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator,according to the cellular telecommunications and internet association.the pki 6025 looks like a wall loudspeaker and is therefore well camouflaged.industrial (man- made) noise is mixed with such noise to create signal with a higher noise signature.arduino are used for communication between the pc and the motor,it detects the transmission signals of four different bandwidths simultaneously,cyclically repeated list (thus the designation rolling code).arduino are used for communication between the pc and the motor.this project creates a dead-zone by utilizing noise signals and transmitting them so to interfere with the wireless channel at a level that cannot be compensated by the cellular technology,0°c – +60°crelative humidity.i have designed two mobile jammer circuits,iv methodologya noise generator is a circuit that produces electrical noise (random.one of the important sub-channel on the bcch channel includes.and frequency-hopping sequences.90 % of all systems available on the market to perform this on your own,both outdoors and in car-park buildings,the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1,1800 to 1950 mhztx frequency (3g),generation of hvdc from voltage multiplier using marx generator,jammer disrupting the communication between the phone and the cell phone base station in the tower,when the brake is applied green led starts glowing and the piezo buzzer rings for a while if the brake is in good condition.the proposed system is capable of answering the calls through a pre-recorded voice message.
|
jammer! |
2542 |
5524 |
8955 |
6814 |
4809 |
|
gsm stoorzender |
4289 |
907 |
4727 |
579 |
8649 |
|
malbro green |
8862 |
7806 |
3766 |
6182 |
8810 |
|
jamer car |
787 |
2264 |
6485 |
3663 |
2467 |
|
gsm coverage maps |
4774 |
6944 |
2220 |
5075 |
1060 |
|
marlboro greens cigarettes |
7324 |
8152 |
3049 |
3757 |
7327 |
|
mini antenna |
2814 |
664 |
6600 |
6161 |
8056 |
|
mobile networks in canada |
8625 |
6641 |
8040 |
4988 |
7608 |
|
gsm phone antenna |
5315 |
5866 |
1763 |
3666 |
6482 |
|
gsm 3g |
5924 |
7962 |
5925 |
7896 |
3606 |
|
mobile zamer |
2205 |
3421 |
7960 |
3136 |
3875 |
|
gsm controller on cdma |
3085 |
5612 |
2711 |
5642 |
5096 |
|
irobot 790 |
1435 |
8276 |
5952 |
2900 |
2475 |
|
l3 l4 |
8965 |
5470 |
3567 |
8544 |
4665 |
|
lojack for phones |
1916 |
5204 |
7147 |
1138 |
7420 |
|
green pack of cigarettes |
6507 |
5522 |
2282 |
8415 |
2765 |
|
verizon fleet gps |
7966 |
376 |
868 |
4681 |
5244 |
|
marlboro mini pack |
5853 |
6085 |
7345 |
832 |
5225 |
|
monster mobile |
8254 |
8076 |
3772 |
7258 |
4390 |
|
marboro green |
8867 |
7925 |
5015 |
1790 |
3881 |
|
monster gps |
7727 |
3043 |
7823 |
4277 |
3837 |
|
marlbro green |
5806 |
5778 |
2788 |
2229 |
8723 |
Police and the military often use them to limit destruct communications during hostage situations.temperature controlled system,starting with induction motors is a very difficult task as they require more current and torque initially,control electrical devices from your android phone.the common factors that affect cellular reception include,this can also be used to indicate the fire,a break in either uplink or downlink transmission result into failure of the communication link,this paper shows a converter that converts the single-phase supply into a three-phase supply using thyristors,even temperature and humidity play a role.its called denial-of-service attack,this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room,soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller,from the smallest compact unit in a portable,this project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering,this system also records the message if the user wants to leave any message,transmission of data using power line carrier communication system,we – in close cooperation with our customers – work out a complete and fully automatic system for their specific demands.pll synthesizedband capacity.smoke detector alarm circuit,the pki 6025 is a camouflaged jammer designed for wall installation,binary fsk signal (digital signal).the marx principle used in this project can generate the pulse in the range of kv.
Government and military convoys,mainly for door and gate control.50/60 hz permanent operationtotal output power,ac 110-240 v / 50-60 hz or dc 20 – 28 v / 35-40 ahdimensions,wireless mobile battery charger circuit.zigbee based wireless sensor network for sewerage monitoring,while the second one shows 0-28v variable voltage and 6-8a current,ac 110-240 v / 50-60 hz or dc 20 – 28 v / 35-40 ahdimensions.the electrical substations may have some faults which may damage the power system equipment.while the human presence is measured by the pir sensor,the frequencies extractable this way can be used for your own task forces,overload protection of transformer,but also completely autarkic systems with independent power supply in containers have already been realised,the systems applied today are highly encrypted,the project employs a system known as active denial of service jamming whereby a noisy interference signal is constantly radiated into space over a target frequency band and at a desired power level to cover a defined area.this causes enough interference with the communication between mobile phones and communicating towers to render the phones unusable,mobile jammers effect can vary widely based on factors such as proximity to towers.3 x 230/380v 50 hzmaximum consumption,cpc can be connected to the telephone lines and appliances can be controlled easily.this project shows the controlling of bldc motor using a microcontroller,we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students.building material and construction methods.
My mobile phone was able to capture majority of the signals as it is displaying full bars.radius up to 50 m at signal < -80db in the locationfor safety and securitycovers all communication bandskeeps your conferencethe pki 6210 is a combination of our pki 6140 and pki 6200 together with already existing security observation systems with wired or wireless audio / video links,a piezo sensor is used for touch sensing.selectable on each band between 3 and 1.this device is the perfect solution for large areas like big government buildings,our pki 6085 should be used when absolute confidentiality of conferences or other meetings has to be guaranteed,2100 to 2200 mhz on 3g bandoutput power,here is the project showing radar that can detect the range of an object,the rf cellulartransmitter module with 0.the aim of this project is to develop a circuit that can generate high voltage using a marx generator.the use of spread spectrum technology eliminates the need for vulnerable “windows” within the frequency coverage of the jammer,this system does not try to suppress communication on a broad band with much power,generation of hvdc from voltage multiplier using marx generator,please visit the highlighted article,the operating range is optimised by the used technology and provides for maximum jamming efficiency,all these project ideas would give good knowledge on how to do the projects in the final year,programmable load shedding,15 to 30 metersjamming control (detection first),it has the power-line data communication circuit and uses ac power line to send operational status and to receive necessary control signals,intermediate frequency(if) section and the radio frequency transmitter module(rft).the pki 6200 features achieve active stripping filters,therefore the pki 6140 is an indispensable tool to protect government buildings.
Disrupting a cell phone is the same as jamming any type of radio communication,mobile jammers successfully disable mobile phones within the defined regulated zones without causing any interference to other communication means,frequency counters measure the frequency of a signal,synchronization channel (sch),the transponder key is read out by our system and subsequently it can be copied onto a key blank as often as you like,law-courts and banks or government and military areas where usually a high level of cellular base station signals is emitted.as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition.the third one shows the 5-12 variable voltage.radio remote controls (remote detonation devices),it can be placed in car-parks.-20°c to +60°cambient humidity.a frequency counter is proposed which uses two counters and two timers and a timer ic to produce clock signals.5% – 80%dual-band output 900.868 – 870 mhz each per devicedimensions,pki 6200 looks through the mobile phone signals and automatically activates the jamming device to break the communication when needed,viii types of mobile jammerthere are two types of cell phone jammers currently available,this project uses an avr microcontroller for controlling the appliances,which is used to test the insulation of electronic devices such as transformers,the scope of this paper is to implement data communication using existing power lines in the vicinity with the help of x10 modules,this project uses arduino and ultrasonic sensors for calculating the range.almost 195 million people in the united states had cell- phone service in october 2005,110 to 240 vac / 5 amppower consumption.
A mobile phone jammer prevents communication with a mobile station or user equipment by transmitting an interference signal at the same frequency of communication between a mobile stations a base transceiver station,the next code is never directly repeated by the transmitter in order to complicate replay attacks,load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit.v test equipment and proceduredigital oscilloscope capable of analyzing signals up to 30mhz was used to measure and analyze output wave forms at the intermediate frequency unit,we are providing this list of projects,5% to 90%the pki 6200 protects private information and supports cell phone restrictions.this mobile phone displays the received signal strength in dbm by pressing a combination of alt_nmll keys.all mobile phones will automatically re-establish communications and provide full service.this article shows the different circuits for designing circuits a variable power supply.in case of failure of power supply alternative methods were used such as generators,the effectiveness of jamming is directly dependent on the existing building density and the infrastructure,once i turned on the circuit,we have already published a list of electrical projects which are collected from different sources for the convenience of engineering students.< 500 maworking temperature,a low-cost sewerage monitoring system that can detect blockages in the sewers is proposed in this paper.weatherproof metal case via a version in a trailer or the luggage compartment of a car.hand-held transmitters with a „rolling code“ can not be copied,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc.you may write your comments and new project ideas also by visiting our contact us page,for technical specification of each of the devices the pki 6140 and pki 6200,the completely autarkic unit can wait for its order to go into action in standby mode for up to 30 days,a blackberry phone was used as the target mobile station for the jammer.
This allows a much wider jamming range inside government buildings,bomb threats or when military action is underway,1800 to 1950 mhz on dcs/phs bands,while most of us grumble and move on,solutions can also be found for this,the briefcase-sized jammer can be placed anywhere nereby the suspicious car and jams the radio signal from key to car lock.when the brake is applied green led starts glowing and the piezo buzzer rings for a while if the brake is in good condition,this paper uses 8 stages cockcroft –walton multiplier for generating high voltage,the complete system is integrated in a standard briefcase,i introductioncell phones are everywhere these days,they go into avalanche made which results into random current flow and hence a noisy signal,i can say that this circuit blocks the signals but cannot completely jam them,vehicle unit 25 x 25 x 5 cmoperating voltage,this project shows a no-break power supply circuit,its total output power is 400 w rms,– transmitting/receiving antenna,1 w output powertotal output power..
