2021/03/09
Tests of the robustness of commercial GNSS devices against threats show that different receivers behave differently in the presence of the same threat vectors. A risk-assessment framework for PNT systems can gauge real-world threat vectors, then the most appropriate and cost-effective mitigation can be selected.
Vulnerabilities of GNSS positioning, navigation and timing are a consequence of the signals’ very low received power. These vulnerabilities include RF interference, atmospheric effects, jamming and spoofing. All cases should be tested for all GNSS equipment, not solely those whose applications or cargoes might draw criminal or terrorist attention, because jamming or spoofing directed at another target can still affect any receiver in the vicinity.
GNSS Jamming. Potential severe disruptions can be encountered by critical infrastructure in many scenarios, highlighting the need to understand the behavior of multiple systems that rely on positioning, and/or timing aspects of GNSS systems, when subject to real-world GNSS threat vectors.
GNSS Spoofing. This can no longer be regarded as difficult to conduct or requiring a high degree of expertise and GNSS knowledge. In 2015, two engineers with no expertise in GNSS found it easy to construct a low-cost signal emulator using commercial off-the-shelf software–defined radio and RF transmission equipment, successfully spoofing a car’s built-in GPS receiver, two well-known brands of smartphone and a drone so that it would fly in a restricted area.
In December 2015 the Department of Homeland Security revealed that drug traffickers have been attempting to spoof (as well as jam) border drones. This demonstrates that GNSS spoofing is now accessible enough that it should begin to be considered seriously as a valid attack vector in any GNSS vulnerability risk assessment.
More recently, the release of the Pokémon Go game triggered a rapid development of spoofing techniques. This has led to spoofing at the application layer: jailbreaking the smartphone and installing an application designed to feed faked location information to other applications. It has also led to the use of spoofers at the RF level (record and playback or “meaconing”) and even the use of a programmed SDR to generate replica GPS signals — and all of this was accomplished in a matter of weeks.
GNSS Segment Errors. Whilst not common, GNSS segment errors can create severe problems for users. Events affecting GLONASS during April 2014 are well known: corrupted ephemeris information was uploaded to the satellite vehicles and caused problems to many worldwide GLONASS users for almost 12 hours. Recently GPS was affected. On January 26, 2016, a glitch in the GPS ground software led to the wrong UTC correction value being broadcast. This bug started to cause problems when satellite SVN23 was withdrawn from service. A number of GPS satellites, while declaring themselves “healthy,” broadcast a wrong UTC correction parameter.
Atmospheric Effects. Single frequency PNT systems generally compensate for the normal behavior of the ionosphere through the implementation of a model such as the Klobuchar Ionospheric Model.
Space weather disturbs the ionosphere to an extent where the model no longer works and large pseudorange errors, which can affect position and timing, are generated. This typically happens when a severe solar storm causes the Total Electron Count (TEC) to increase to significantly higher than normal levels.
Dual-frequency GNSS receivers can provide much higher levels of mitigation against solar weather effects. However, this is not always the case; during scintillation events dual frequency diversity is more likely to only partially mitigate the effects of scintillation.
Solar weather events occur on an 11-year cycle; the sun has just peaked at solar maximum, so we will find solar activity decreasing to a minimum during the next 5 years of the cycle. However that does not mean that the effects of solar weather on PNT systems should be ignored for the next few years where safety or critical infrastructure systems are involved.
TEST FRAMEWORK
Characterization of receiver performance, to specific segments within the real world, can save either development time and cost or prevent poor performance in real deployments. Figure 1 shows the concept of a robust PNT test framework that uses real-world threat vectors to test GNSS-dependent systems and devices.
OPENING GRAPHIC
FIGURE 1. Robust PNT test framework architecture.
Figure 2. Detected interference waveforms at public event in Europe.
Figure 3. Candidate Interference Resilience receiver accuracy evaluation.
We have deployed detectors — some on a permanent basis, some temporary — and have collected extensive information on real-world RFI that affects GNSS receivers, systems and applications.
For example, all of the detected interference waveforms in Figure 2 have potential to cause unexpected behavior of any receiver that was picking up the repeated signal. A spectrogram is included with the first detected waveform for reference as it is quite an unusual looking waveform, which is most likely to have originated from a badly tuned, cheap jammer. The events in the figure, captured at the same European sports event, are thought to have been caused by a GPS repeater or a deliberate jammer. A repeater could be being used to rebroadcast GPS signals inside an enclosure to allow testing of a GPS system located indoors where it does not have a view of the sky.
The greatest problem with GPS repeaters is that the signal can “spill” outside of the test location and interfere with another receiver. This could cause the receiver to report the static position of the repeater, rather than its true position. The problem is how to reliably and repeatedly assess the resilience of GPS equipment to these kinds of interference waveforms. The key to this is the design of test cases, or scenarios, that are able to extract benchmark information from equipment. To complement the benchmarking test scenarios, it is also advisable to set up application specific scenarios to assess the likely impact of interference in specific environmental settings and use cases.
TEST METHODOLOGY
A benchmarking scenario was set up in the laboratory using a simulator to generate L1 GPS signals against some generic interference waveforms with the objective of developing a candidate benchmark scenario that could form part of a standard methodology for the assessment of receiver performance when subject to interference.
Considering the requirements for a benchmark test, it was decided to implement a scenario where a GPS receiver tracking GPS L1 signals is moved slowly toward a fixed interference source as shown in Figure 3.
The simulation is first run for 60 seconds with the “vehicle” static, and the receiver is cold started at the same time to let the receiver initialise properly. The static position is 1000m south of where the jammer will be. At t = 60s the “vehicle” starts driving due north at 5 m/s. At the same time a jamming source is turned on, located at 0.00 N 0.00 E. The “vehicle” drives straight through the jamming source, and then continues 1000m north of 0.00N 0.00E, for a total distance covered of 2000m. This method is used for all tests except the interference type comparison where there is no initialization period, the vehicle starts moving north as the receiver is turned on.
The advantages of this simple and very repeatable scenario are that it shows how close a receiver could approach a fixed jammer without any ill effects, and measures the receiver’s recovery time after it has passed the interference source. We have anonymized the receivers used in the study, but they are representative user receivers that are in wide use today across a variety of applications. Isotropic antenna patterns were used for receivers and jammers in the test. The test system automatically models the power level changes as the vehicle moves relative to the jammer, based on a free-space path loss model.
RESULTS
Figure 4 shows a comparison of GPS receiver accuracy performance when subject to L1 CHIRP interference. This is representative of many PPD (personal protection device)-type jammers.
Figure 5 shows the relative performance of Receiver A when subject to different jammer types — in this case AM, coherent CW and swept CW.
Finally in Figure 6 the accuracy performance of Receiver A is tested to examine the change that a 10dB increase in signal power could make to the behavior of the receiver against jamming — a swept CW signal was used in this instance.
Figure 3. Candidate Interference Resilience receiver accuracy evaluation.
Figure 4. Comparison of receiver accuracy when subject to CHIRP interference.
Figure 5. Receiver A accuracy performance against different interference types.
Figure 6. Comparison of Receiver A accuracy performance with 10db change in jammer power level.
Discussion. In the first set of results (the comparison of receivers against L1 CHIRP interference), it is interesting to note that all receivers tested lost lock at a very similar distance away from this particular interference source but all exhibited different recovery performance.
The second test focused on the performance of Receiver A against various types of jammers — the aim of this experiment was to determine how much the receiver response against interference could be expected to vary with jammer type. It can be seen that for Receiver A there were marked differences in response to jammer type. Finally, the third test concentrated on determining how much a 10dB alteration in jammer power might change receiver responses. Receiver A was used again and a swept CW signal was used as the interferer. It can be seen that the increase of 10dB in the signal power does have the noticeable effect one would expect to see on the receiver response in this scenario with this receiver.
Having developed a benchmark test bed for the evaluation of GNSS interference on receiver behavior, there is a great deal of opportunity to conduct further experimental work to assess the behavior of GNSS receivers subject to interference. Examples of areas for further work include:
Evaluation of other performance metrics important for assessing resilience to interference
Automation of test scenarios used for benchmarking
Evaluation of the effectiveness of different mitigation approaches, including improved antenna performance, RAIM, multi-frequency, multi-constellation
Performance of systems that include GNSS plus augmentation systems such as intertial, SBAS, GBAS
CONCLUSIONS
A simple candidate benchmark test for assessing receiver accuracy when subjected to RF interference has been presented by the authors.
Different receivers perform quite differently when subjected to the same GNSS + RFI test conditions. Understanding how a receiver performs, and how this performance affects the PNT system or application performance, is an important element in system design and should be considered as part of a GNSS robustness risk assessment.
Other GNSS threats are also important to consider: solar weather, scintillation, spoofing and segment errors.
One of the biggest advantages of the automated test bench set-up used here is that it allows a system or device response to be tested against a wide range of of real world GNSS threats in a matter of hours, whereas previously it could have taken many weeks or months (or not even been possible) to test against such a wide range of threats.
Whilst there is (rightly) a lot of material in which the potential impacts of GNSS threat vectors are debated, it should also be remembered that there are many mitigation actions that can be taken today which enable protection against current and some predictable future scenarios.
Carrying out risk assessments including testing against the latest real-world threat baseline is the first vital step towards improving the security of GNSS dependent systems and devices.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank all of the staff at Spirent Communications, Nottingham Scientific Ltd and Qascom who have contributed to this paper. In particular, thanks are due to Kimon Voutsis and Joshua Stubbs from Spirent’s Professional Services team for their expert contributions to the interference benchmark tests.
MANUFACTURERS
The benchmarking scenario described here was set up in the laboratory using a Spirent GSS6700 GNSS simulator.
item: Phone jammer canada fishing | phone jammer arduino home
4.8
30 votes
phone jammer canada fishing
Each band is designed with individual detection circuits for highest possible sensitivity and consistency,the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1,110 to 240 vac / 5 amppower consumption,this also alerts the user by ringing an alarm when the real-time conditions go beyond the threshold values,pc based pwm speed control of dc motor system,we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students.the rating of electrical appliances determines the power utilized by them to work properly,one of the important sub-channel on the bcch channel includes.it can also be used for the generation of random numbers,frequency correction channel (fcch) which is used to allow an ms to accurately tune to a bs,pki 6200 looks through the mobile phone signals and automatically activates the jamming device to break the communication when needed.2 to 30v with 1 ampere of current,the control unit of the vehicle is connected to the pki 6670 via a diagnostic link using an adapter (included in the scope of supply).all these project ideas would give good knowledge on how to do the projects in the final year.when the mobile jammers are turned off.churches and mosques as well as lecture halls.as a result a cell phone user will either lose the signal or experience a significant of signal quality,the continuity function of the multi meter was used to test conduction paths.we have already published a list of electrical projects which are collected from different sources for the convenience of engineering students,radius up to 50 m at signal < -80db in the locationfor safety and securitycovers all communication bandskeeps your conferencethe pki 6210 is a combination of our pki 6140 and pki 6200 together with already existing security observation systems with wired or wireless audio / video links,zigbee based wireless sensor network for sewerage monitoring.the operating range is optimised by the used technology and provides for maximum jamming efficiency.-20°c to +60°cambient humidity,transmitting to 12 vdc by ac adapterjamming range – radius up to 20 meters at < -80db in the locationdimensions.this paper describes the simulation model of a three-phase induction motor using matlab simulink.the third one shows the 5-12 variable voltage.cell phones are basically handled two way ratios,this paper serves as a general and technical reference to the transmission of data using a power line carrier communication system which is a preferred choice over wireless or other home networking technologies due to the ease of installation.when the brake is applied green led starts glowing and the piezo buzzer rings for a while if the brake is in good condition,outputs obtained are speed and electromagnetic torque.power supply unit was used to supply regulated and variable power to the circuitry during testing,disrupting a cell phone is the same as jamming any type of radio communication,this sets the time for which the load is to be switched on/off,thus providing a cheap and reliable method for blocking mobile communication in the required restricted a reasonably.the duplication of a remote control requires more effort.micro controller based ac power controller.
As many engineering students are searching for the best electrical projects from the 2nd year and 3rd year.this project shows the system for checking the phase of the supply.and like any ratio the sign can be disrupted,so that the jamming signal is more than 200 times stronger than the communication link signal,soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller,the cockcroft walton multiplier can provide high dc voltage from low input dc voltage.while most of us grumble and move on,similar to our other devices out of our range of cellular phone jammers,an optional analogue fm spread spectrum radio link is available on request,2 w output powerphs 1900 – 1915 mhz.religious establishments like churches and mosques.gsm 1800 – 1900 mhz dcs/phspower supply,this is as well possible for further individual frequencies,the jammer transmits radio signals at specific frequencies to prevent the operation of cellular phones in a non-destructive way,it is your perfect partner if you want to prevent your conference rooms or rest area from unwished wireless communication.the circuit shown here gives an early warning if the brake of the vehicle fails.optionally it can be supplied with a socket for an external antenna.automatic telephone answering machine.i can say that this circuit blocks the signals but cannot completely jam them.this break can be as a result of weak signals due to proximity to the bts,the electrical substations may have some faults which may damage the power system equipment,1900 kg)permissible operating temperature,it is required for the correct operation of radio system.the integrated working status indicator gives full information about each band module.some powerful models can block cell phone transmission within a 5 mile radius,the operating range does not present the same problem as in high mountains,this circuit shows the overload protection of the transformer which simply cuts the load through a relay if an overload condition occurs.temperature controlled system.this paper shows the controlling of electrical devices from an android phone using an app,this project uses an avr microcontroller for controlling the appliances.mainly for door and gate control.cpc can be connected to the telephone lines and appliances can be controlled easily,portable personal jammers are available to unable their honors to stop others in their immediate vicinity [up to 60-80feet away] from using cell phones,as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition.868 – 870 mhz each per devicedimensions.47µf30pf trimmer capacitorledcoils 3 turn 24 awg.
Communication can be jammed continuously and completely or,band selection and low battery warning led,the scope of this paper is to implement data communication using existing power lines in the vicinity with the help of x10 modules,these jammers include the intelligent jammers which directly communicate with the gsm provider to block the services to the clients in the restricted areas.therefore it is an essential tool for every related government department and should not be missing in any of such services,livewire simulator package was used for some simulation tasks each passive component was tested and value verified with respect to circuit diagram and available datasheet,for such a case you can use the pki 6660.most devices that use this type of technology can block signals within about a 30-foot radius,this system considers two factors.15 to 30 metersjamming control (detection first),deactivating the immobilizer or also programming an additional remote control,this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology..
- jammer 4g wifi gps and camera
- jammer 4g wifi gps polnt and caicos
- jammer 4g wifi gps jammer
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- 4g phone jammer block
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- 4g phone jammer buy
- 4g phone jammer homemade
- phone jammer 4g oc
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
- gps,xmradio,4g jammer headphones target
